ECPGR Homepage


Back to ECPGR Networks

Cereals Network


Triticale and Rye Genetic Resources in Europe.
Ad hoc Meeting,
28 September 2006, Nyon, Switzerland

[PDF file 850KB]


Report of the ECPGR Network Coordinating Groups.
First Meeting,
29-31 March 2006, Bonn, Germany

[PDF file 566KB]


Rescue collections of Aegilops sharonensis in Israel
Final report
[PDF file 164KB]


The European Triticale Database


Working Groups





Avena







Barley







Wheat


  Background information   Safety-duplication
  Documentation   Quality standards
  Sharing of responsibilities   In situ / On-farm conservation

Background information

The Cereals Network will hold its second meeting in Foça, Turkey, on 21-24 April 2008.

A Triticale and Rye ad hoc meeting was held in Nyon, Switzerland, on 28 September 2006 (see: report [here]).

A meeting of the ECPGR Network Coordinating Groups took place in Bonn, Germany, on 29-31 March 2006. See:
Report of the ECPGR Network Coordinating Groups. First Meeting, 29-31 March 2006, Bonn, Germany.
Presentations given during the NCGs meeting

The first meeting of the Cereals Network was held in Yerevan, Armenia, 3-5 July 2003. The Network endorsed the priorities for Phase VII as established by the Steering Committee (Turkey 2003), and stressed as a high priority the increased, sustainable and continuous utilization of PGR as envisaged by the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA).

The Cereals Network is overseen by a Network Coordinating Group (NCG), composed of the Working Group Chairs plus a number of other coopted Network members.

The responsibilities of the Network Coordinating Group are:

  • To formulate proposals, in consultation with the WG members, for the attention of the ECPGR Steering Committee on WG priorities and activities, following the planning and prioritizing mechanism established by the SC

  • To define the WGs to remain prioritized during the 5-year Phase, according to the planning and prioritizing mechanism established by the SC

The main implementation of the Cereals Network activities is through the three Working Groups on Avena, Barley and Wheat.

Documentation

The NCG acknowledged that the main progress made by the Working Groups was in the area of documentation, however, the need to continue adding information, especially pedigree data and characterization and evaluation data was identified. It was also pointed out that passport data are not always complete and need further work.

It was recommended that some basic standards for Central Crop Databases (CCDBs) search options be developed. A proposal was made that a specific meeting of the Documentation and Information Network to discuss the issue of characterization and evaluation data should be held in the near future.
The introduction of the use of the Geographic Information Systems (GIS) by the CCDB managers for the analysis of germplasm distribution was also recommended. The need to improve the quality of geo-references was stressed, as well as the need to facilitate links and to move towards integration of European data with other national and international databases.

Sharing of responsibilities for germplasm conservation

The status of the debate on sharing responsibilities within the ECPGR Networks has been summarized during the ad hoc Cereals Network Coordinating Group meeting in Poland (2000) (see: full presentation by W. Podyma [here], also available from the meeting report at pp. 53-57). He invited the Cereals Network to proceed a step further in the implementation of an agreed mechanism. The preferred approach is that curators offer to take responsibility for a list of accessions. The essential role of the DB manager in any mechanism of shared responsibility was, however, stressed.
The DB manager was said to be in the best condition to analyze the data and pinpoint gaps or duplications remaining after the curators have assumed responsibility for their own list of accessions.
In Yerevan (2003), the following recommendations were agreed:

DB managers agreed to analyze their DBs to define lists of unique accessions conserved in different genebanks and send these lists to the WG members

Working Group members and genebank curators, in consultation with appropriate authorities and after further interaction with the DB manager, are encouraged to take the responsibility for conservation

Safety-duplication

The need to implement a system at the Cereals Network level for the safety-duplication of all unique accessions was expressed. It was suggested that small groups with representation from the different WGs should be established to prepare documents for the attention of the Network in order to find solutions to common problems.

Quality standards

During the NCG meeting in Poland (2000), it was recommended that the genebanks cooperating with the Cereals Network adopt the principles of the ISO 9000 (see: full presentation by C. U. Germeier and L. Frese [here], also available from the meeting report at pp. 43-52) and that they develop their own quality guidelines for cereal collections and publish them. To adopt the ISO system for quality standard improvement, genebanks would need to appoint a quality manager and publish a handbook of internally applied standards.

Genebanks that have already developed internal protocols are encouraged to send copies to C. Germeier, to be used for further distribution and discussion within the Network.

In situ / On-farm conservation

A list of wild relatives of cultivated plants indigenous in Europe is now available, derived from data received from the Flora Europea project (University of Reading, UK).
Concern for the risk of loss of some wild relative species that are very rare and therefore at high risk of loss, such as the recently discovered Avena insularis in Sicily, was expressed.

On the on-farm conservation side, it is expected that a modification of the seed law in the EU will allow growing and trade of local varieties of importance for genetic diversity conservation and use. The importance of cooperation with Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in this area should also be stressed.
It is suggested to the Steering Committee to look for possibility of cooperation in the area of PGR with agro-environmental programs and the European Ecological Network NATURA 2000 in particular countries.

Contacts

Network Coordinator:
Mr Helmut Knüpffer


Network Coordinating Group members


Documents


Network Related Publications

Budget
as of December 06


Meetings & Reports


Cereals Network
Meetings & Reports

Network Coordinating Group
Meetings & Reports

Avena Working Group
Meetings & Reports

Barley Working Group
Meetings & Reports

Wheat Working Group
Meetings & Reports

Maize, Secale and Triticale
Meetings & Reports


Databases


ECPGR Cereals Databases