|
During the first cool days of October (14-17), the N.I. Vavilov Research
Institute of Plant Industry (VIR) and the historic city of St.
Petersburg, Russian Federation, offered their hospitality and ambience
as inspiration for the eighth meeting of the ECPGR Steering Committee.
Progress made by this Cooperative Programme during the first part of
Phase VI (1999–2003) was evaluated, and recommendations and adjustments
made for the remaining two years and beyond.
Participants included representatives from 29 of the 35 member countries,
and observers from six other European countries, who were encouraged to join the Programme.
Observers from the International Association of Plant Breeders for the
Protection of Plant Varieties (ASSINSEL), the Man and Biosphere
Programme (EuroMAB), FAO, IPGRI, the Nordic Gene Bank (NGB), and an NGO
representative, actively participated in the meeting, ensuring closer
links between ECPGR and their organizations. A representative from the
European Commission was unable to attend, but expressed interest in
attending future meetings.
The agenda included several policy items, especially relevant to the
convening of this Steering Committee meeting, just prior to the final
negotiations of the revision of the International Undertaking (IU), (see
article above). The Steering Committee endorsed a statement expressing
support for the package of benefit sharing, financial arrangements and
facilitated access as identified in the draft of the IU. The statement
also expressed concern for the limited list of crops to which the
Multilateral System would apply, and urged it to be expanded so that the
system could have maximum effect on world food security.
Regarding conservation in Europe, general support was given for a
system of responsibility sharing, as indicated by the results of a
questionnaire sent by the IPGRI Secretariat to collection holders.
Increased involvement and responsibility by the private sector and NGOs
was recommended, and further data analysis was suggested to identify
appropriate responsibility sharing mechanisms to facilitate the
implementation efforts of the Working Groups.
A presentation of progress made at this mid-way point in Phase VI
demonstrated that several activities undertaken were directly
recommended by the Braunschweig Symposium on PGRFA (1998) such as the
implementation of priority activities of the Global Plan of Action in
Europe. These include, inter alia, the establishment of
networking activities on wild relatives of cultivated crops, on-farm
conservation and underutilized crops; Working Groups’ initiatives for
the rationalizing of regeneration methods and the establishment of core
collections; inter-regional collaboration, and further development of a
PGR information system in Europe.
The Committee noted that a larger number of activities than
originally planned had taken place during the first part of Phase VI,
including meetings of the Beta, Potato and Barley Working Groups.
This was due to a revision of the workplans and budget, promoted by the
new Network Coordinating Groups. The careful planning of joint meetings
and other savings ensured the availability of the required funds, making
it possible to plan for an increase in the number of activities and an
expansion of the scope of ECPGR to an enlarged range of crops in the
remaining two years.
Three new Working Groups were established (Medicinal and Aromatic
Plants, Solanaceae and Vitis), and new activities on Arachis,
flax, sunflower, cucurbits, leafy vegetables, Secale and
Triticale were encouraged. Meetings of the Forages, Malus/Pyrus
and Prunus Working Groups were also planned. The Committee
commended the Thematic Networks for their intense activity at the
outset, and approved the further development of proposed initiatives,
such as inter-regional cooperation workshops on policy, documentation
and in situ conservation; a project
to survey genetic diversity of Romanian landraces conserved on-farm;
meetings of the On-Farm Task Force to promote collaborative action in
Europe, and the participation of non-EU national documentation Focal
Persons in the EPGRIS project meetings (see page 5).
After reviewing the objectives and modus operandi of
ECPGR,
the Committee recommended that two of the objectives be given increased
attention during the remainder of Phase VI, specifically, to facilitate
the increased utilization of PGRFA Europe and to increase awareness, at
all levels, of the importance of PGRFA activities including conservation
and sustainable use. Regarding the effectiveness of "full" Network
meetings (i.e. more than one Working Group), the Committee felt the need
to be flexible in the future and to be attentive to the perceived needs
of the Networks. It was recommended that each Network carefully assess
the potential benefits of full Network meetings against the high cost
involved.
The design of a strategy for the future of ECPGR is expected to
emerge from the work of two proposed Task Forces addressing
complementary issues: 1) The impact of recent developments in relevant
science, technology and international policy on crop genetic resources
in general, on ECPGR policies and future workplan; 2) The
implementation of relevant international agreements by genebanks and how
these will affect the work of genebanks and other collection holders.
The brainstorming undertaken by these Task Forces promises to set the
scene for the next Phase of ECPGR, to be discussed at the ninth
Steering Committee meeting to be held in October 2003.
A detailed report of this meeting is available from the
Secretariat
[here].
|